Table 1.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Single-Row MCL Repair Technique
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Technically simple and reproducible. | Our technique is relatively nonanatomical at the femoral insertion site, as we chose a common attachment for sMCL and POL. |
Preserves the native MCL, hence helps in maintaining proprioception. | MCL repair can be difficult if the tissue quality is too bad. |
Use of a single implant reduces the cost and hardware-related complications. | We performed this technique only in cases of femoral side insufficiency, and further studies are required in tibial side tears. |
No graft requirement, hence no graft site morbidity. | This technique cannot be performed in chronic midsubstance tear. |
No tunnel requirement, hence, no tunnel coalescence in multiligament injury reconstruction. | |
Use of the periosteal tissue for better healing. | |
Similar functional outcome obtained when compared with other reconstruction techniques. |
MCL, medial collateral ligament, POL, posterior oblique ligament; sMCL, superficial medial collateral ligament.