Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;12:727004. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.727004

Table 3.

Association of IGFBPs with waist-to-height ratio in adolescents.

Linear Regression
β1 95% CI p β2 95% CI p
IGFBP-1 (log) -1.72 -2.11, -1.33 <0.001 -1.72 -2.07, -1.37 <0.001
IGFBP-3 86.13 -301.12, 473.37 0.66 89.21 -299.35, 477.78 0.65
IGFPB-7 1.24 -4.03, 6.50 0.65 1.19 -4.08, 6.47 0.66
Logistic Regression
OR1 95% CI p OR2 95% CI p
IGFBP-1
Lower Tertile 4.55 2.74, 7.56 <0.001 5.70 3.26, 9.96 <0.001
Middle Tertile 1.26 0.78, 2.03 0.35 1.44 0.87, 2.39 0.16
Upper Tertile 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
IGFBP-3
Lower Tertile 1.05 0.62, 1.80 0.84 1.06 0.62, 1.80 0.84
Middle Tertile 1.06 0.62, 1.81 0.83 1.05 0.62, 1.80 0.85
Upper Tertile 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
IGFBP-7
Lower Tertile 0.77 0.48, 1.23 0.28 0.77 0.48, 1.24 0.28
Middle Tertile 1.10 0.69, 1.76 0.68 1.11 0.69, 1.77 0.68
Upper Tertile 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref

1Unadjusted.

2Adjusted for age categories and sex.

In linear regression, IGF binding protein (IGFBP) and WC/Ht ratio were used as continuous variables N= 419 (IGFBP-1), 332 (IGFBP-3) and 428 (IGFBP-7). IGFBP-1 was log-transformed for normality.

Odds Ratios (OR) were calculated using binary logistic regression in which the response variable (WC/Ht ratio) was categorized into non-obesogenic waist (WC/Ht ratio ≤ 0.5 and obesogenic waist (WC/Ht ratio > 0.5), with the normal non-obesogenic waist as the reference category.