Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 14;117:104764. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104764

Table 2.

Schema for antagonist activity confidence scoring.

Source Criteria Confidence Score Contribution
AR pathway model AUC (Antagonist) ≥ 0.1 2
0.1 > AUC (Antagonist) ≥ 0.001 1
Cell stress/cytotoxicity flag average Z-score > 3 2
average Z-score < 1 −1
Confirmation assay dataa true antagonist shift (hit/hit) 3
true antagonist shift (no hit/hit) 2
FLAG: true antagonist shift but CI overlap 1
FLAG: wrong direction shift (hit/hit) −1
FLAG: wrong direction (hit/no hit) −1
Maximum receptor value AUC (antagonist) < AUC (any other) −1
Cell-free assay activity (A1-A3) A1-A3 are all inactive −1
a

See the original AR model paper for more details (Kleinstreuer et al., 2017).