Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2020 Mar 9;82(5):1587–1605. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12676

Table 5.

Father Involvement Stratified by Child’s Sex

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Males (n = 1,436) Females (n = 1,368)

Internalizing behaviors Externalizing behaviors Internalizing behaviors Externalizing behaviors

Model 1: Mother and biological father relationship in middle childhood (ref=did not live together)
 Lived together at one wave −0.13 (0.09) 0.02 (0.10) 0.09 (0.09) 0.09 (0.09)
 Lived together at two waves −0.09 (0.07) −0.11 (0.08) −0.03 (0.07) −0.06 (0.07)
Model 2: Hour spent (ref=no hour at both waves)
 Never at one wave and some at one wave −0.12 (0.09) −0.06 (0.10) 0.06 (0.10) 0.03 (0.10)
 Some hour at both waves −0.17+ (0.09) −0.19* (0.10) −0.08 (0.09) −0.10 (0.09)
 Daily at both waves −0.20* (0.10) −0.23* (0.10) −0.16 (0.10) −0.13 (0.10)
Model 3: Close to biological father (Age 9), ref=not extremely close
 Extremely close −0.06 (0.06) −0.12* (0.06) −0.09 (0.07) −0.06 (0.06)
 Not asked (did not see father) −0.04 (0.08) −0.01 (0.10) 0.01 (0.10) 0.05 (0.09)
Model 4: Youth-reported activity scale, std (Age 9) −0.02 (0.03) −0.06+ (0.03) −0.09** (0.03) −0.08** (0.03)
Model 5: Mother-reported father engagement, std (Ages 5 and 9) −0.11*** (0.03) −0.12*** (0.03) −0.10** (0.03) −0.04 (0.03)

Note: Robust standard errors in parentheses. Models control for baseline and Year 3 variables and child’s age at Year 15.

***

p < .001.

**

p < .01.

*

p < .05.

+

p < .10.