Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;17(2):e1161. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1161

Table 3.

Data extraction framework

Category Data items
Context
  • Source
  • Author
  • Publication year
  • Income level: low; middle income; global
  • Countries
Population
  • Age group: children (0–4); children (5–9); early adolescence (10–14); older adolescence (15–19); adult 20–64; old age (65+); age range [state]
  • Recipient of programme: female; male; other [state]; subgroup [state]
  • Targeted indirect beneficiaries: female; male; other [state]; subgroup [state]
Intervention
  • Type of social protection programme(s): social assistance [state]; social insurance [state]; labour market [state]; social care [state]; other [state]
  • Intervention name [state]
  • Duration of intervention [state]
  • Institution(s) providing the programme(s): government agency; government agency and nongovernmental organisation; government agency and private organisation; other [state]
Methodology
  • Type of review: systematic review; systematic review with meta‐analysis; rapid evidence assessment; rapid review; review protocol
  • Type of analysis: quantitative [state]; qualitative [state]
  • Number of included studies [state]
  • Review time range [state]
  • Types of included studies: experimental; quasi‐experimental; observational cross‐sectional; observational longitudinal; qualitative; mixed methods; other [state]
  • Measurements [state]
  • Outcome(s) and outcome area: economic security and empowerment; improved health; enhanced education; improved mental health and psychosocial well‐being; increased protection; enhanced voice and agency; other [state]
  • Comparison [state]
  • Risk of bias used in review
Quality appraisal
  • Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Was the search strategy appropriate? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were there methods to minimise errors in data extraction? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
  • Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? (met; not met; unclear; not applicable)
Review findings—Research question 1 Results by outcome area:
  • Economic security and empowerment [state]
  • Improved health [state]
  • Enhanced education [state]
  • Improved mental health and psychosocial well‐being [state]
  • Increased protection [state]
  • Enhanced voice and agency [state]
  • Other [state]
If quantitative findings (gender):
  • Type, magnitude and direction of effect size [state]
  • Summary of cost‐effectiveness findings [state]
Review findings—Research question 2 Moderators:
  • Intra‐household dynamics [state]
  • Access to market [state]
  • Social and cultural norms [state]
  • Gender norms [state]
  • Gender‐responsive policies and laws [state]
  • Macroeconomic conditions [state]
  • Conflict and instability [state]
  • Political conditions [state]
  • Availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability and quality of services [state]
  • Other [state]
Structural and individual drivers:
  • Discriminatory gender norms [state]
  • Harmful traditional practices [state]
  • Gender discriminatory laws and policies [state]
  • Age and stage in the lifecycle [state]
  • Household composition [state]
  • Social identify [state]
  • Disability [state]
  • Other [state]
Review findings—Research question 3 Design factors:
  • Objectives [state]
  • Benefit design [state]
  • Eligibility criteria and targeting [state]
  • Incentives, conditionalities, coresponsibilities [state]
  • Payment/benefit delivery [state]
  • Messaging, labelling and nudges [state]
  • Linkages to complementary programme services [state]
  • Other [state]
Implementation factors:
  • Implementation and fidelity of design [state]
  • Capacity in delivery of benefits and services [state]
  • M&E [state]
  • Sex‐ and age‐disaggregated data [state]
  • Integrated management information systems and social and information registries [state]
  • Grievance and redress mechanisms [state]
  • Other [state]
Other
  • Recommendations [state]
  • Research gaps [state]