| Methods | Design: Randomized control trial |
| Setting: New York, United States | |
| Follow up: 24 months | |
| Recruitment: Participants were referred by hospitals, drop‐in centres, outreach teams, direct outreach by project staff, self‐referrals, and other agencies | |
| Randomization: Participants were randomized but the procedures were not mentioned in the paper | |
| Allocation: Allocation procedures were not mentioned | |
| Blinding: Interviewers were blind to participants' assignment for baseline interviews but not for follow‐up interviews | |
| Timing of outcome assessment: Every 6 months for up to 24 months | |
| Outcome assessor: Interviewers trained to engage individuals who are homeless and mentally ill | |
| Participants | Population: Homeless individuals with dual diagnoses |
| Sample size: Total n = 225, Intervention n = 99, TAU n = 126 | |
| Interventions | Intervention: |
| Pathways to housing; immediate provision of an apartment of the participant's own without any prerequisites for psychiatric treatment or sobriety; participants were also offered treatment, support, and other services by the programme's assertive community treatment team with two modifications (a nurse practitioner and housing specialist). | |
| Comparator: | |
| Usual care: Continuum of Care supportive housing programs subscribe to the abstinence‐sobriety model based on the belief that without strict adherence to treatment and sobriety, housing stability is not possible. | |
| Outcomes | Housing stability, mental health, quality of life, substance use, hospital admission |
| Notes |