Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154
Methods Design: Cost analysis from the perspective of government (Medicaid)
Participants Population: Adults with serious mental illness and chronic homelessness or dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance use
Interventions Intervention:
Placed and unplaced individuals to the New York City supportive housing programme (housing placement not contingent on adhering to treatment or services)
Comparator:
NA
Outcomes Cost or cost‐effectiveness: The housing programme was associated with total Medicaid cost savings (−$9,526 [95% CI −$19,038 to –2,003])
Notes