Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 5;17(1):e1141. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1141
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk After obtaining informed consent from the parents, neonates satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomized prior to starting enteral feeds into two groups using computer generated random numbers kept in opaque sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk After obtaining informed consent from the parents, neonates satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomized prior to starting enteral feeds into two groups using computer generated random numbers kept in opaque sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Unclear risk No details are provided in the study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk No details are provided in the study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Low risk Miminal loss to follow up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Author seem to report all the outcomes
Other bias Low risk No other bias was noted