Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;16(2):e1085. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1085
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: “The 9 schools were randomly assigned to 3 study groups”
Comment: Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: “The 9 schools were randomly assigned to 3 study groups”
Comment: Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Low risk Quote: “Each milk supplement was supplied in colour‐coded UHT cartons with the identity of the supplement being unknown to both subjects and investigators during the course of the study.”
Comment: Adequately done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Low risk Quote: “Each milk supplement was supplied in colour‐coded UHT cartons with the identity of the supplement being unknown to both subjects and investigators during the course of the study.”
Comment: Adequately done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Low risk Comment:
Group 1:29/238 loss to follow‐up
Group 2: 18/260 loss to follow‐up
Group 3: 12/259 loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: Trial registration not reported. Outcomes specified in the methodology section were reported
Other bias Low risk Comment: No other biases detected