Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;17(2):e1156. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1156
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk

Quote: “…designed, implemented and evaluated DISHA in two Indian states: Bihar and Jharkhand.”

Comment: the program evaluation mentions the use of a control group but whether these groups were villages in these states or outside is unclear

Similar baseline characteristics Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Similar baseline outcome measurement Unclear risk Comment: there were differences between participant outcomes between the two states at baseline—however both these outcomes were reported for the intervention, with minimal information on the control cohort's baseline outcomes.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Unclear risk
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk Comment: greater sample size following the intervention (at end line)
Prevention of knowledge of allocated intervention Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Protection against contamination Unclear risk Comment: it is unclear whether the control sites were within the same states/villages as the intervention sites, which may have led to contamination
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement; and no protocol was found
Other bias Low risk Comment: study seems free from other bias