Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;17(2):e1156. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1156
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: unit of allocation as by villages
Similar baseline characteristics High risk

Quote: “Findings indicate that while largely similar, despite village‐ as well as sample‐level matching on educational attainment, young people in intervention areas were marginally better off in terms of household economic status, educational attainments, and economic activity than those in control areas.”

Comment: baseline characteristics were not adequately similar

Similar baseline outcome measurement Unclear risk

Quote: “The training programme was not evaluated and hence no baseline data were available for assessing longer‐term changes among trainees”

Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Unclear risk
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Prevention of knowledge of allocated intervention Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Protection against contamination Low risk Comment: allocation was by village
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement, and no protocol was found.
Other bias Low risk Comment: study appears free of other bias