Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;22:610. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07755-3

Table 3.

Summary of phenotypic data

Group Breeds Abbreviation Sample size Average annual egg numbern Totalb
High productivity White Leghorna WL 100 315 220
Dwarfc DW 60 280
Rhode Island Redd RIR 60 310
low productivity Beijing Youe BY 42 110 222
Henan Gamef HN 13 100
Xishuangbanna Gameg XS 10 110
Turpanh TU 11 70
Zhangzhou Gamei ZZ 10 80
Luxi Gamej LX 10 40–60
Tibetank TB 42 40–80
Hongshanl HS 42 116
Taihe Silkiesm SK 42 110
Total 442

aWhite Leghorn came from two different groups. Among them, 40 samples obtained from the Experimental Chicken Farm at the China Agricultural University, 60 samples obtained from Beijing Yanqing Commercial Layer Breeding Company. Their abbreviations are WL_CAU and WL_YQ, respectively

bRegarding the sample size, we tried to make the ratio between case and control was 1:1 to avoid the large number difference between the two groups interfering the results

cDwarf chickens obtained from Beijing Yanqing Commercial Layer Breeding Company

dRhode Island Red obtained from Beijing

eBeijing You chickens obtained from Beijing

fHenan Game obtained from Henan province

gXishuangbanna Game obtained from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan province

hTurpan obtained from Turpan, Xinjiang

iZhangzhou Game obtained from Fujiang province

jLuxi Game obtained from Shandong province

kTibetan obtained from four different places, including the Experimental Chicken Farm at the China Agricultural University, Nimu, Tibet, Naidong, Tibet and Lingzhi, Tibet

lHongshan chickens obtained from Hubei province

mTaihe Silkies chickens obtained from the Experimental Chicken Farm at the China Agricultural University

nRefer to the poultry genetic resources in China