Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;15(3):e1040. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1040
Item Point in time (where applicable) Rating
1a Study design (Potential confounders taken into account) End of intervention High confidence: RCT, RDD, ITT, IV
Medium confidence: DiD with matching, PSM
Low confidence: other matching
1b Study design (Potential confounders taken into account) Longest follow up (if applicable) Study design may change at post endline follow up, usually loss of RCT as control becomes treated. Same codes as 1a
2 Masking or blinding (RCTs only) High confidence: any blinding or any mention of blinding
Medium confidence: no blinding
Low confidence is not used for this item
3 Power calculations are reported High confidence: any mention of power calculations as basis for sample size
Medium confidence: no mention of power calculations
Low confidence is not used for this item
4a Losses to follow up are presented and acceptable* End of intervention High: attrition within IES bounds
Medium: attrition close to IES bounds
Low: attrition not reported or attrition outside IES bounds
N/A for ex post studies
4b Losses to follow up are presented and acceptable* Longest follow up (if applicable) High: attrition within IES bounds
Medium: attrition close to IES bounds
Low: attrition not reported or attrition outside IES bounds
N/A for ex post studies
5 Intervention if clearly defined High confidence: intervention clearly and fully described
Medium confidence: brief description of intervention
Low confidence: intervention named but not described, or not named
6 Outcome measures are clearly defined and reliable High confidence: outcome measure clearly and fully described, preferably with reference to validation
Medium confidence: brief description of outcome
Low confidence: outcome named but not described
7 Baseline balance (N.A. for before vs. after) High confidence: RCT or baseline balance report and satisfactory (imbalance on 5% or <5%)
Medium confidence: Imbalance between 5% and 10%
Low confidence: Baseline balance not reported, or reported and lack of balance on 10% or >10%
Overall confidence in study findings End of intervention Lowest rating across items 1a, 4a, 6 and 7
Overall confidence in study findings Longest follow up (if applicable) Lowest rating across items 1b, 4b, 6 and 7 (N/A if 1b and 4b N/A)

*Maximum acceptable rate of differential attrition for each overall attrition rate (Source: Deke, Sama‐Miller & Hershey, 2015).

DiD, difference in difference; IES, Institute of Education Studies; ITT, intention to treat; IV, instrumental variable; PSM, Propensity Score Matching; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RDD, regression disconyinuity design.