Item | Point in time (where applicable) | Rating | |
---|---|---|---|
1a | Study design (Potential confounders taken into account) | End of intervention | High confidence: RCT, RDD, ITT, IV |
Medium confidence: DiD with matching, PSM | |||
Low confidence: other matching | |||
1b | Study design (Potential confounders taken into account) | Longest follow up (if applicable) | Study design may change at post endline follow up, usually loss of RCT as control becomes treated. Same codes as 1a |
2 | Masking or blinding (RCTs only) | High confidence: any blinding or any mention of blinding | |
Medium confidence: no blinding | |||
Low confidence is not used for this item | |||
3 | Power calculations are reported | High confidence: any mention of power calculations as basis for sample size | |
Medium confidence: no mention of power calculations | |||
Low confidence is not used for this item | |||
4a | Losses to follow up are presented and acceptable* | End of intervention | High: attrition within IES bounds |
Medium: attrition close to IES bounds | |||
Low: attrition not reported or attrition outside IES bounds | |||
N/A for ex post studies | |||
4b | Losses to follow up are presented and acceptable* | Longest follow up (if applicable) | High: attrition within IES bounds |
Medium: attrition close to IES bounds | |||
Low: attrition not reported or attrition outside IES bounds | |||
N/A for ex post studies | |||
5 | Intervention if clearly defined | High confidence: intervention clearly and fully described | |
Medium confidence: brief description of intervention | |||
Low confidence: intervention named but not described, or not named | |||
6 | Outcome measures are clearly defined and reliable | High confidence: outcome measure clearly and fully described, preferably with reference to validation | |
Medium confidence: brief description of outcome | |||
Low confidence: outcome named but not described | |||
7 | Baseline balance (N.A. for before vs. after) | High confidence: RCT or baseline balance report and satisfactory (imbalance on 5% or <5%) | |
Medium confidence: Imbalance between 5% and 10% | |||
Low confidence: Baseline balance not reported, or reported and lack of balance on 10% or >10% | |||
Overall confidence in study findings | End of intervention | Lowest rating across items 1a, 4a, 6 and 7 | |
Overall confidence in study findings | Longest follow up (if applicable) | Lowest rating across items 1b, 4b, 6 and 7 (N/A if 1b and 4b N/A) |
*Maximum acceptable rate of differential attrition for each overall attrition rate (Source: Deke, Sama‐Miller & Hershey, 2015).
DiD, difference in difference; IES, Institute of Education Studies; ITT, intention to treat; IV, instrumental variable; PSM, Propensity Score Matching; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RDD, regression disconyinuity design.