Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;15(3):10.1002/cl2.1042. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1042
Code Description
Study ID From Covidence
Date coded
Coder initials
Correspondence required Add a note here if authors will need to be contacted to request additional information
Reference identification
Title
First author
Year
Type of publication (drop‐down) Journal article / Book / Conference abstract / Dissertation / Report / Other
Other Define “other” publication type
Funder
Country
City and region (if applicable)
Start date of study
End date of study
Study duration
Aim of the study
Authors’ definition of empowerment
Authors’ rationale for empowerment approach
Methods
Study design (drop‐down) RCT / cRCT / CBA / ITS / DID / RDD / PSM / other
Other Define “other” study design type
Study design description
Comparison group Describe the nature of the comparison group
Statistical method Describe method used and comment on appropriateness.
Intervention
Number of treatment arms (drop‐down) 1–10
Description of treatment arm 1
Description of treatment arm 2 (continue adding as needed)
Type of nutrition intervention (drop‐down–select all that apply) Micronutrient supplementation / Fortification / Education or Counselling / School feeding / Other supplemental nutrition / Other
Description of nutrition intervention
Type of agency intervention (drop‐down–select all that apply) Mentorship program / Leadership skills training / Technical or occupational skills training / Program leadership role for girls / Peer education / Peer support group / Other
Description of agency intervention
Type of opportunity structure intervention (drop‐down—select all that apply) Cash transfer program / Savings and loan program / Education support / Girls’ rights advocacy or education (with parents, teachers, community influencers) / Prevention of early marriage and pregnancy / Other
Description of opportunity structure intervention
Intervention setting (drop‐down – select all that apply) School / Community / Home / Health Facility / Other
Other Describe “other” intervention setting
Geography (drop‐down – select all that apply) Urban / Rural / Remote / Slum / Other
Other Describe other geographic setting
Intervention administrator (drop‐down) Foreign government / local or national government / non‐government organization / community‐based organization / Academic institution / Other
Other Describe other intervention administrator
Intervention provider (drop‐down – select all that apply) Community health workers / Health facility staff / Teachers / Peers / Parents / Volunteers / Other
Other Describe other intervention provider
Provider training Describe the training of providers to deliver intervention
Recruitment Describe procedures for recruiting participants
Attrition rate The proportion of participants lost during the intervention or during follow‐up.
Reach Describe the degree to which the intended audience participated in an intervention by “their presence”
Dose Describe the proportion or amount of an intervention delivered to participants. E.g., measures of frequency, duration, and/or intensity
Fidelity / integrity Describe the degree to which the intervention was delivered as intended.
Adaptation Describe the degree to which the program content was intentionally changed during implementation to improve programme effectiveness
Prior needs assessment Describe any needs assessment that was conducted to inform intervention design
Reminders Describe any prompts or reminders sent to participants to attend / participate in intervention
Quality Describe any findings related to the quality of quality of intervention materials/ resources (e.g., curriculum, training, and policy)
Cultural appropriateness Describe any findings related to the cultural appropriateness of the intervention
Contamination Describe any unintentional delivery of intervention to the control group or inadvertent failure to deliver intervention to experimental group
Cointervention Describe any instances where interventions other than the treatment were applied differently to intervention conditions
Participant engagement Describe participant's interaction with or receptivity to the intervention (i.e., what they think or how they feel about the intervention)
Contextual factors Describe any social, built, and political factors internal (e.g., partnerships) and external to the intervention environment (e.g., social norms) that shape implementation.
Study population
Number of participants
Number in intervention group
Number in comparison group
Age range of study participants Enter age range of study target population, e.g. 15–49 years
Age range of adolescent study participants Enter age range for female adolescents who are included in study, e.g., 15–24 years
Age sub‐groups List all age sub‐groups for which data are provided, e.g. study covers 15–49 years, and analyses were done separately for 15–19 years, 20–24 years, 25–49 years
Did the study population also include men or boys? (drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Adolescent participants’ school status (drop‐down) In school / out of school / Both / Unclear
Race / ethnicity / language Describe
Religion Describe
Socio‐economic status Describe
Disability, physical health Describe
Includes pregnant participants (drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Includes young mothers (drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Conflict setting (drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Food insecure setting (drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Outcomes
Primary outcomes Define outcomes and how they are measured
Secondary outcomes Define outcomes and how they are measured
Method of assessing outcomes Describe methods for assessing outcome measures
Validity and reliability of outcomes measures Describe primary authors’ views on the validity and reliability of outcome measures
Follow‐up of non‐respondents Describe the methods used to follow‐up non‐respondents
Timing of outcome assessment Describe frequency of assessment, length of follow‐up, etc.
Results
Number of participants in Treatment Arm 1 (continue adding rows for each treatment arm)
Number of participants in Treatment Arm 2 (continue adding rows for each treatment arm)
Number of participants in comparison group
For each outcome…
Direction of effect (drop‐down) Effect favours treatment / Effect favours comparison / Effect favours neither / Cannot tell
Effect statistically significant? (drop‐down) Yes / No / Cannot tell
Treatment sample size
Control sample size
Number of missing participants
Nature of the measure (drop‐down) Continuous / Dichotomous / Other
If outcome measure is continuous…
Treatment group mean
Comparison group mean
Are reported means adjusted? (drop‐down) Yes / No / Cannot tell
Treatment group standard deviation
Comparison group standard deviation
Treatment group standard error
Comparison group standard error
t‐value for an independent t‐test
If outcome measure is dichotomous…
Treatment group number of participants who experienced a change
Comparison group number of participants who experienced a change
Treatment group proportion of participants who experienced a change
Comparison group proportion of participants who experienced a change
Are the proportions adjusted for pretest variables?
Logged odds ratio
Standard error of logged odds ratio
Adjusted logged odds ratio
Chi‐square with degrees of freedom
Correlation coefficient
Adverse events
Adverse events List all adverse events of integrating women's empowerment, as described by primary authors.