Code	Description
Study ID	from Covidence
Date coded
Coder initials
Correspondence required	Add a note here if authors will need to be contacted to request additional information
Reference identification
Title
First author
Year
Type of publication	(drop‐down) Journal article / Book / Conference abstract / Dissertation / Report / Other
Other	Define “other” publication type
Funder
Country
City and region (if applicable)
Start date of study
End date of study
Aim of the study
Authors’ definition of empowerment
Authors’ rationale for empowerment approach
Methods
Study design description
Study duration
Participant inclusion/exclusion criteria
Quality assessment (CASP)
Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Is there a clear statement of findings?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
How valuable is the research?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Support for judgement (incl. pg #)
Study population
Number of participants
Study scale	Small (e.g., one/several village) / large (e.g., district, region, province)
Describe scale
Study setting	(drop‐down) Urban / Rural / Informal‐urban / Remote / Other
Describe setting
Target	(drop‐down) Individual / Household / Community / Other
Describe target
Age range of study participants	Enter age range of study target population, e.g. 15–49 years
Adolescent age range	Enter age range for female adolescents who are included in study, e.g., 15–24 years
Age subgroups	List all female age sub‐groups for which data are provided, e.g. study covers 15–49 years, and analyses were done separately for 15–19 years, 20–24 years, 25–49 years
Did the study population also include men or boys?	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Adolescent participants’ school status	(drop‐down) In school / out of school / Both / Unclear
Race / ethnicity / language	Describe
Religion	Describe
Socio‐economic status	Describe
Disability, physical health	Describe
Includes pregnant participants	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Includes young mothers	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Conflict setting	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Food insecure setting	(drop‐down) Yes / No / Unclear
Intervention
Type of nutrition intervention	(drop‐down – select all that apply) Micronutrient supplementation / Fortification / Education or Counselling / School feeding / Other supplemental nutrition / Other
Description of nutrition intervention
Type of agency intervention	(drop‐down – select all that apply) Mentorship program / Leadership skills training / Technical or occupational skills training / Program leadership role for girls / Peer education / Peer support group / Other
Description of agency intervention
Type of opportunity structure intervention	(drop‐down – select all that apply) Cash transfer program / Savings and loan program / Education support / Girls’ rights advocacy or education (with parents, teachers, community influencers) / Prevention of early marriage and pregnancy / Other
Description of opportunity structure intervention
Intervention setting	(drop‐down – select all that apply) School / Community / Home / Health Facility / Other
Describe intervention setting
Intervention administrator	(drop‐down) Foreign government / local or national government / non‐government organization / community‐based organization / Academic institution / Other
Describe intervention administrator
Intervention provider	(drop‐down – select all that apply) Community health workers / Health facility staff / Teachers / Peers / Parents / Volunteers / Other
Describe intervention provider
Provider training	Describe the training of providers to deliver intervention
Recruitment	Describe procedures for recruiting participants
Attrition rate	The proportion of participants lost during the intervention or during follow‐up.
Reach	Describe the degree to which the intended audience participated in an intervention by “their presence”
Dose	Describe the proportion or amount of an intervention delivered to participants. E.g., measures of frequency, duration, and/or intensity
Fidelity / integrity	Describe the degree to which the intervention was delivered as intended.
Adaptation	Describe the degree to which the program content was intentionally changed during implementation to improve programme effectiveness
Prior needs assessment	Describe any needs assessment that was conducted to inform intervention design
Reminders	Describe any prompts or reminders sent to participants to attend / participate in intervention
Quality	Describe any findings related to the quality of quality of intervention materials/ resources (e.g., curriculum, training, and policy)
Cultural appropriateness	Describe any findings related to the cultural appropriateness of the intervention
Contamination	Describe any unintentional delivery of intervention to the control group or inadvertent failure to deliver intervention to experimental group
Cointervention	Describe any instances where interventions other than the treatment were applied differently to intervention conditions
Participant engagement	Describe participant's interaction with or receptivity to the intervention (i.e., what they think or how they feel about the intervention)
Contextual factors	Describe any social, built, and political factors internal (e.g., partnerships) and external to the intervention environment (e.g., social norms) that shape implementation.
Measures
Feasibility (the extent to which an intervention is practical or viable in a particular context or situation)
Cultural sensitivity of program
Participant engagement
Community/public commitment
Appropriateness (the extent to which an intervention or activity fits with a particular context or situation)
Participants’ views on programme acceptability
Implementers’ views on programme acceptability
Community support for programme
Meaningfulness (the extent to which an intervention or activity is positively experienced by an individual or group)
Participants’ views on programme as a positive or negative experience
Participants’ views on benefits and costs of participation
Participants’ awareness of own nutritional needs
Participants’ motivation to act for improved nutrition
Community desire to support participants to act for improved nutrition
Adverse events
Adverse events	List all adverse events of integrating women's empowerment, as described by primary authors.