Table 3.
Results of Three-Way Interaction Model Examining the Stress-Buffering Hypothesis for Latinx and Non-Latinx White Students
Full sample |
||
---|---|---|
Effects | Coefficient (SE) | Significance |
Anxiety | ||
Gender | .78 (0.70) | .264 |
Age | −0.01 (0.02) | .570 |
Parental education | −0.08 (0.22) | .723 |
Immigranta | −2.53 (1.27) | .047 |
Perceived stress | 7.41 (0.62) | .001 |
Social support | −2.71 (0.97) | .005 |
PS * SS | −6.91 (1.22) | .001 |
Ethnic group | −0.29 (0.70) | .680 |
PS * EG | −1.12 (1.01) | .272 |
SS * EG | 2.29 (1.44) | .113 |
PS * SS * EG | 5.46 (1.65) | .001 |
Constant | 8.09 (0.66) | .001 |
Depression | ||
Gender | 0.46 (0.64) | .471 |
Age | 0.01 (0.02) | .740 |
Parental education | 0.05 (0.20) | .786 |
Immigranta | −1.21 (1.17) | .300 |
Perceived stress | 8.30 (0.57) | .001 |
Social support | −3.55 (0.89) | .001 |
PS * SS | −4.98 (1.13) | .001 |
Ethnic group | 0.42 (0.64) | .516 |
PS * EG | −0.47 (0.93) | .611 |
SS * EG | −0.33 (1.32) | .802 |
PS * SS * EG | 1.46 (1.51) | .333 |
Constant | 8.30 (1.25) | .001 |
Note.
Immigrant controls for generational status and compares immigrant and U.S.-born participants (reference group). None of the interactions including demographic variables (i.e., gender, age, or immigrant status were significant). Final parsimonious model presented with control variables included.
PS = Perceived Stress; SS = Social Support; EG = Ethnic Group)