Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Lat Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;9(2):161–178. doi: 10.1037/lat0000184

Table 3.

Results of Three-Way Interaction Model Examining the Stress-Buffering Hypothesis for Latinx and Non-Latinx White Students

Full sample
Effects Coefficient (SE) Significance
Anxiety
 Gender  .78 (0.70) .264
 Age −0.01 (0.02) .570
 Parental education −0.08 (0.22) .723
 Immigranta −2.53 (1.27) .047
 Perceived stress   7.41 (0.62) .001
 Social support −2.71 (0.97) .005
 PS * SS −6.91 (1.22) .001
 Ethnic group −0.29 (0.70) .680
 PS * EG −1.12 (1.01) .272
 SS * EG   2.29 (1.44) .113
 PS * SS * EG   5.46 (1.65) .001
 Constant   8.09 (0.66) .001
Depression
 Gender   0.46 (0.64) .471
 Age   0.01 (0.02) .740
 Parental education   0.05 (0.20) .786
 Immigranta −1.21 (1.17) .300
 Perceived stress   8.30 (0.57) .001
 Social support −3.55 (0.89) .001
 PS * SS −4.98 (1.13) .001
 Ethnic group   0.42 (0.64) .516
 PS * EG −0.47 (0.93) .611
 SS * EG −0.33 (1.32) .802
 PS * SS * EG   1.46 (1.51) .333
 Constant   8.30 (1.25) .001

Note.

a

Immigrant controls for generational status and compares immigrant and U.S.-born participants (reference group). None of the interactions including demographic variables (i.e., gender, age, or immigrant status were significant). Final parsimonious model presented with control variables included.

PS = Perceived Stress; SS = Social Support; EG = Ethnic Group)