Table 1.
No. of runs included/collected from each subject in studies 1 and 2
| Subject | Study | Fixation | Language Localizer | Motor Localizer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 1 | 24/24 | 8/8 | 8/8 |
| S2 | 1 | 20/24 | 7/8 | 8/8 |
| S3 | 2 | 8/8 | 8/8 | |
| S4 | 2 | 8/8 | 8/8 | |
| S5 | 2 | 8/8 | 8/8 | |
| S6 | 2 | 8/8 | 7/8 | |
| S7 | 2 | 8/8 | 8/8 |
Study 1 included a fixation, a language localizer, and a motor localizer task. The numbers below each task label indicate the no. of runs included/collected. Study 2 included a fixation and a language localizer task only. Individual runs were excluded based on criteria that included head motion and signal-to-noise ratio thresholds as well as sleepiness in the scanner. Correspondence of subject numbers shown here vs. Braga and Buckner (2017): S1 and S2 vs. S4 and S3, respectively. Correspondence of subject numbers shown here vs. DiNicola et al. (2020): S3 and S4 vs. S1 and S2; S5–S7 vs. S4–S6.