Table 2.
No. of runs included/collected from each subject in studies 3 and 4
| Subject | Study | Fixation | Language Localizer | Motor Localizer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S8 | 3 | 11/11 | 6/6 | |
| S9 | 3 | 11/11 | 6/6 | |
| S10 | 3 | 6/6 | 4/4 | |
| S11 | 3 | 8/11 | 6/6 | |
| S12 | 3 | 10/11 | 6/6 | |
| S13 | 3 | 11/11 | 6/6 | |
| S14 | 4 | 6/6 | 4/4 | |
| S15 | 4 | 5/11 | 6/6 | |
| S16 | 4 | 11/11 | 6/6 | |
| S17 | 4 | 11/11 | 6/6 | |
| S18 | 4 | 11/11 | 6/6 |
Studies 3 and 4 included the fixation and language localizer tasks. The numbers below each task label indicate the no. of runs included/collected. Two subjects (S10 and S14) completed only 2 sessions, resulting in fewer collected runs of each task. Individual runs were excluded based on criteria that included head motion and signal-to-noise ratio thresholds as well as sleepiness in the scanner. For S15, 1 fixation run was included, in error, that surpassed the motion threshold (>1.8 mm). Data from additional tasks were previously reported for these subjects. Correspondence of subject numbers shown here vs. DiNicola et al. (2020): S8–S16 vs. S7–S15; S17 and S18 vs. S17 and S18.