Table 7. Mediation analyses with Collective Responsibility as the mediator and vaccination intention as the dependent variable (n = 1127).
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Indirect effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Vaccination Intention | Collective Responsibility | Vaccination Intention | ||||
| Paths | c (total effect) | a | b and c’ (direct effect) | a*b | |||
| Coefficient | β | p | β | p | β | p | Indirect effect [95% BC-CI] |
| Predictors | |||||||
| Perceived risk of C-19: others | 0.03 | .27 | 0.13 | < .001 | -0.05 | .04 | 0.08 [0.04, 0.13] |
| Benefits vaccine: self vs others | -0.04 | .13 | 0.05 | .09 | -0.08 | < .001 | 0.03 [-0.01, 0.07] |
| Pyschopathy | -0.10 | < .001 | -0.13 | < .001 | -0.02 | .35 | -0.08 [-0.13, -0.04] |
| Altruism | 0.01 | .66 | 0.09 | .01 | -0.04 | .09 | 0.06 [0.01, 0.10] |
| Need to Belong | 0.14 | < .001 | 0.11 | < .001 | 0.06 | .01 | 0.07 [0.03, 0.11] |
| Control variables | |||||||
| Female (= 1) | -0.14 | < .001 | -0.08 | .01 | -0.08 | < .001 | |
| Belgium dummy (= 1) | -0.14 | < .001 | -0.09 | .04 | -0.09 | .01 | |
| Portugal dummy (= 1) | 0.03 | .41 | 0.06 | .12 | -0.01 | .82 | |
| Mediator | |||||||
| Collective Responsibility | 0.65 | < .001 | |||||
| R2 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.45 | ||||
Note: The indirect effects that are bold printed do not contain zero in their 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals (95% BC-CI) and are interpreted as being statistically significant. β is a standardized coefficient. The indirect effect is completely standardized for continuous variables and partially standardized for binary variables.