Table 1.
Feature comparisons between QMaker and two previously published estimation procedures (Whelan and Goldman 2001; Le and Gascuel 2008)
| Feature | Whelan and Goldman | Le and Gascuel | QMaker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tree reconstruction | Neighbor-joining (Saitou and Nei 1987) with Dayhoff F
distances |
PhyML (Guindon and Gascuel 2003) with WAG 4 model |
IQ-TREE(Nguyen et al. 2015) with best-fit model |
| Branch length estimation | Scaled on JTT F |
ML estimate | ML estimate |
| Rate heterogeneity across sites | No | Gamma model (Yang 1994) | Gamma(Yang 1994), invariant site (Gu et al. 1995), and free rate model (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) |
| Algorithm to optimize the ML parameters | Expectationmaximization | Expectation maximization | Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (Fletcher 1987) |
| Multicore CPU support | No | No | Yes |
| Explicit separation of training and testing data | No | No | Yes |


