Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 29;94(3):273–281. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1842

Table I.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author/Year No. of patients BC subtype AR assessment Concomitant/ experimental treatment Definition of AR Prognostic value
Kensler /2019 3021 ER+ IHC Tamoxifen/ Letrozole ≥ 1% Not associated with prognosis
Lehmann /2014 50 TNBC FFPE sections, DAKO clone AR411 No >30% Favorable in combination AR antagonists with PI3K/mTOR inhibitors
Conde /2004 39 CIS, infiltrating carcinoma IHC+ immunobloting Tamoxifen No Presence of DAX-1 may interfere with endocrine therapy
Guiu /2018 333 TNBC IHC No 1% AR+/ FOXA1+ worse outcome
Dieci /2019 263 TNBC IHC Neo/adjuvant treatment 1% AR+ is associated with worse outcome
Elebro /2017 910 BC IHC Yes >10% AR+/ER− worse prognosis
Park /2009 413 BC IHC No ≥ 10% lower tumor burden and favorable differentiation
Gonzalez /2008 83 BC IHC No >10% AR are represented in breast cancer and are correlated with the expression of some MMPs and TIMP-2.
Caiazza /2016 2091 TNBC IHC Enzalutamide >10% Provide an alternative treatment for patients with AR-positive TNBC.
Traina /2018 57 TNBC IHC Enzalutamide ≥ 10% Clinical efficacy, well tolerated
Gucalp /2013 424 ER/PgR-negative IHC Bicalutamide ≥ 10% Efficacy, minimally toxic androgen blockade
Castellano /2010 953 ER+ IHC No 10% Prognostic factor of better outcome