Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 11;12:4868. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25135-z

Table 1.

Summary of the performance characteristics of our best-performing blue OLEDs and comparison with the best-performing, to date, blue TADF OLEDs19,20 and blue PHOLED9.

HTM//ETM EML/λem (nm) Turn-on voltage (V)a FWHM (nm)b Maximum luminance (cd m−2) Maximum efficiency CIE 1931 (x, y)c Ref.
CE (cd A−1) PE (lm W−1) EQE (%)
DCDPA//TSPO1 DBFPO : TDBA-DI/458 2.5 65 37590

68.0

(48.0)

82.1

(26.3)

37.8

(29.0)

(0.15, 0.28) This work
T2fQ//TSPO1 DBFPO : TDBA-DI/458 2.5 65 49530

72.2

(61.7)

87.2

(36.8)

41.2

(34.6)

(0.15, 0.28) This work
DCDPA// DBFPO/TPBi DBFPO : TDBA-DI/458 3.1 65 47680

64.4

(57.0)

57.2

(33.0)

38.2

(34.3)

(0.15, 0.28) Ref. 19
mCP//DPEPO DspiroS-TRZ/480 2.9 70 18446 90 101 38.4 (0.176, 0.374) Ref. 20
dmCP//TmPyPB CbBPCb : FIrpic/473 75 7000 53.6 50.6 30 Ref. 9

CE current efficiency, PE power efficiency.

aTurn-on voltage at 1 cd m−2.

bFWHM at 10 mA cm−2.

cCIE 1931 coordinates.

dBest phosphorescence OLED.