Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Birth Defects Res. 2021 Feb 19;113(8):633–643. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1877

TABLE 2.

Selection probabilities for case and control mothers given self-reported body mass index under three assumptions about occurrence of selection bias in the study

Assumption 1a
Assumption 2b
Assumption 3c
Self-reported body mass index category Case mothers Control mothers Case mothers (LB, SB) Case mothers(TOP)d Control mothers Cases mothers (LB, SB) Cases mothers(TOP)d Control mothers
Underweight 0.67 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65*0.84

Normal weight 0.67 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65*1.04

Overweight 0.67 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65*0.96

Obesity 0.67 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65*0.89

Missing 0.67 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65 0.67 0.67*p 0.65*1.00

Abbreviations: LB, live birth; SB, stillbirth; TOP, termination of pregnancy.

a

Study participation rates are the only source of selection bias.

b

Study participation rates and underascertainment of cases contribute to selection bias.

c

Study participation rates and underascertainment of cases contribute to selection bias and study participation rates vary by case–control status and prepregnancy body mass index.

d

p is the selection probability for mothers in sites and years with and without active ascertainment of cases among prenatal diagnoses: p = .22 among mothers enrolled under active ascertainment; p = .14 among mothers who were not.