Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;23(4):341–356. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13016

Table 3.

Details of the studies investigating cohort effects on age‐at‐onset distributions in bipolar disorder.

Study N Country Diagnosis Recruitment Definition of age at onset Method of determining AAO Mean age of sample at study entry (SD) Cohort Early onset Mid‐onset Late onset
Mean (SD), % Mean (SD), % Mean (SD), %

Bauer et al. (2015)

4037 23 countries across Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe, North and South America

DSMI‐IV

BPI

Data obtained retrospectively from 36 collection sites for a study of the impact of solar insolation on the age of onset of bipolar disorder Age at first episode of depression, mania or hypomania meeting DSM‐IV criteria (according to medical case notes and interviews). Medical records and semi‐structured interviews 48.1 (14.5)

Whole sample without birth cohorts (n = 4037)

With birth cohorts incl. in model (n = 4037): born <1940, 1940‐1959, >1959

Youngest cohort, born >1959 (n = 2550)

17.2 (3.2), 41.7%

20.7 (5.8), 62.1%

18.1 (3.7), 56.9%

23.9 (5.1), 24.7%

N/A

N/A

32.20 (12.0), 33.6%

30.1 (10.4), 37.9%

25.8 (8.4), 43.1%

Golmard et al. (2016) 3896

Belgium,

Denmark,

Finland,

France,

Germany,

Greece,

Ireland,

Italy,

The Netherlands,

Norway,

Portugal,

Spain,

Switzerland and the UK

DSM‐IV or ICD−10 BPI Inpatients and outpatients recruited for participation in genetic studies, and patients recruited for the EMBLEM study, a multicentre study conducted in 14 different European countries between 1993 and 2008 Age at which DSM‐IV criteria for an affective episode was first met (according to medial case notes and interviews) Medical records. And semi‐structured clinical interviews 44.0 (13.3)

Whole sample born >1960

Whole sample born ≤1960

Matched for age at interview (n = 125):

Born >1960

Born ≤1960

20.6 (3.7), 65%

19.3 (3.0), 49.7%

18.2 (2.5), 48%

16.9 (0.9), 16%

26.8 (1.7), 26%

25.9 (1.8), 32.8%

29.8 (0.5), 9%

29.8 (0.5), 17.6%

30.9 (5.3), 52%

27.1 (6.9), 84%