Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;99(4):e480–e488. doi: 10.1111/aos.14606

Table 2.

Reliability and validity analysis of the NEI VFQ‐25 and VF‐14 using classical test theory.

Index (item number of subscale) Score (mean ± SD) Cronbach's α Average item–total score correlation Floor responses (%) Ceiling responses (%)
VF‐14 46.5 ± 15.0 0.95 0.709 0.9 0.1
NEI VFQ‐25 76.1 ± 19.0 0.89 0.734 0.0 0.1
General health (1) 39.4 ± 19.7 NA NA 6.6 1.0
General vision (1) 45.5 ± 16.8 NA NA 0.2 0.1
Ocular pain (2) 85.5 ± 20.8 0.67 0.860 0.3 56.3
Near activities (3) 67.5 ± 24.7 0.80 0.738 1.4 14.2
Distance activities (3) 77.6 ± 23.7 0.90 0.762 0.8 36.9
Social functioning (2) 86.8 ± 22.3 0.89 0.823 1.1 63.5
Mental health (4) 78.7 ± 24.9 0.88 0.772 0.9 35.2
Role difficulties (2) 71.8 ± 29.5 0.93 0.932 1.7 44.6
Dependency (3) 81.0 ± 27.2 0.93 0.942 1.1 59.0
Driving* (3) 73.4 ± 35.1 0.77 0.744 12.2 49.1
Colour vision (1) 88.4 ± 22.8 NA NA 1.7 73.0
Peripheral vision (1) 81.1 ± 23.7 NA NA 0.6 51.5

NA = not applicable (statistics need two or more items), NEI VFQ‐25 = National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire, SD = standard deviation, VF‐14 = Visual Function Index.

*

287 samples in the ‘Driving’ subscale due to missing responses (not driving for other reasons).