Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Nov 2;23(5):838–840. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2019

Table 1.

Diagnostic performance of the H2FPEF and HFA‐PEFF scores

AUC (95% CI) Cut‐off Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV
H2FPEF 0.77 (0.71–0.83) ≥6 52.7% 82.5% 26.8% 93.5%
HFA‐PEFF 0.88 (0.82–0.93)* ≥5 70.0% 90.5% 38.8% 97.2%

Results were similar when excluding imputed data. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

*

P < 0.009 vs. H2FPEF.