Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e044778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044778

Table 1.

Main characteristics of all articles included in the meta-analysis

Order Studies Year Country Design No. knees
RA-UKA
Follow-up (month) Complication Revision Robot
systems
Function scoring system
1 Cobb et al25 2006 UK RCT 19
15
4.5 1
2
Null Acrobot system
(Acrobot)
AKSS, WOMAC
2 Lonner and Moretti3 2010 USA PCT 31
27
3 1
0
Null Tactile Guidance System (MAKO) Null
3 Hansen et al14 2014 USA Case–control 30
32
24 7
3
0
1
RIO System
(MAKO)
Recovery time
first, ambulation
4 MacCallum et al23 2016 USA PCT 87
177
32.4 3
7
3
7
RIO System
(Stryker Mako)
Null
5 Blyth et al15 2017 UK RCT 64
65
12 1
1
Null Acrobot system
(Acrobot)
AKSS
6 Gilmour et al30 2018 UK RCT 58
54
24 0
2
0
2
RIO System
(MAKO)
AKSS, OKS, FJS,
pain VAS
7 Kayani et al31 2018 UK PCT 60
60
1 0
2
Null RIO System
(MAKO)
Null
8 Batailler et al32 2018 France Case–control 80
80
19.7 4
7
4
7
Navio system (Smith and Nephew) IKSS
9 Canetti et al33 2018 France Retrospective cohort 11
17
39.3 0
1
Null Navio system (Smith and Nephew) IKSS
10 Banger et al34 2019 UK RCT 74
65
60 0
6
0
2
RIO System
(MAKO)
AKSS, JFS, pain VAS, stiffness, VAS, OKS
11 Wong et al16 2019 USA Retrospective cohort 58
118
3 7
7
7
7
RIO System
(MAKO)
SF-12, WOMAC, KSFS
12 Cool et al19 2019 USA Retrospective comparative study 246
492
24 2
26
2
26
Null Null
13 Kayani et al35 2019 UK PCT 73
73
3 0
2

Null RIO System (MAKO) Pain scores, opiate analgesia, straight leg raise, knee flexion
14 Vakharia et al17 2019 USA Retrospective comparative study 13 617
21 444
36 125
1327
125
1327
Null Null
15 Mergenthaler et al26 2020 France Case–control 200
191
24 19
34
8
21
Navio system (Smith and Nephew) KSS score
16 St Mart et al18 2020 Australia Retrospective comparative study 2851
9561
46 47
301
47
301
Mako-assisted Restoris (MAKO) Null

PCT, prospective cohort trial; RA-UKA, robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; RCT, randomised controlled trial.