TABLE 2.

Growth curve model (GCM) results for each absolute power band

	Absolute log transformed delta	Absolute log transformed theta	Absolute log transformed low‐alpha	Absolute log transformed high‐alpha	Absolute log transformed beta	Absolute log transformed gamma
Change over time	χ 2 (6) = 67.86, p < 0.001	χ 2 (6) = 176.45, p < 0.001	χ 2 (6) = 515.03, p < 0.001	χ 2 (6) = 267.83, p < 0.001	χ 2 (6) = 200.78, p < 0.001	χ 2 (6) = 130.51, p < 0.001
Intercept on
Sex	b = −1.12, p = 0.640	b = −5.49, p = 0.064	b = 12.31, p < 0.001	b = −7.97, p < 0.001	b = −7.19, p < 0.001	b = −5.77, p = 0.006
Risk	b = −6.84, p = 0.004	b = −8.39, p = 0.005	b = −7.73, p = 0.004	b = −9.42, p < 0.001	b = −9.03, p < 0.001	b = −9.36, p < 0.001
Site—Dummy 1 (London)	b = −5.03, p = 0.044	b = 6.15, p = 0.067	b = 6.34, p = 0.036	b = −4.84, p = 0.021	b = 1.97, p = 0.359	b = 1.78, p = 0.413
Site—Dummy 2 (Seattle)	b = 11.70, p < 0.001	b = −12.45, p < 0.001	b = −7.21, p = 0.012	b = −12.70, p < 0.001	b = −5.90, p = 0.004	b = −8.51, p < 0.001
Slope on
Sex	b = 3.30, p = 0.023	b = 5.84, p = 0.001	b = 9.33, p < 0.001	b = 6.27, p < 0.001	b = 6.50, p < 0.001	b = 5.48, p < 0.001
Risk	b = 3.02, p = 0.041	b = 3.97, p = 0.026	b = 3.39, p = 0.067	b = 3.75, p = 0.010	b = 3.61, p = 0.011	b = 3.36, p = 0.024
Outcome on
Sex	b = 1.19, p = 0.014	b = 1.15, p = 0.017	b = 1.44, p = 0.007	b = 1.04, p = 0.021	b = 1.00, p = 0.032	b = 0.88, p = 0.055
Risk	b = 2.68, p < 0.001	b = 2.62, p < 0.001	b = 2.71, p < 0.001	b = 2.52, p < 0.001	b = 2.53, p < 0.001	b = 2.49, p < 0.001
Intercept	b = −0.02, p = 0.247	b = −0.01, p = 0.294	b = 0.01, p = 0.505	b = −0.01, p = 0.540	b = 0.01, p = 0.834	b = 0.01, p = 0.586
Slope	b = −0.09, p = 0.345	b = −0.05, p=0.371	b = −0.04, p = 0.200	b = −0.03, p = 0.523	b = −0.02, p = 0.799	b = 0.01, p = 0.874

Note: The values marked in bold are statistically significant.