Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Oct 16;49(4):1151–1168. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02631-9

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Correlation plots between on TAESS calculations based on invasive and noninvasive imaging for the training dataset showing a high (A) Pearson correlation (r=0.86) for area-averaged TAESS and (B) r=0.85 for arc-averaged TAESS. The linear fit curve has a slope of 1.03 and a y-intercept of 19.4 showing a slightly higher TAESS values for the noninvasive imaging modality. The independent and testing patients show very high correlation between the invasive and noninvasive models for (C) area-averaged and (D) arc-averaged TAESS with a higher TAESS estimation in noninvasive TAESS.