Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Oct 16;49(4):1151–1168. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02631-9

Table 1.

List of patient’s demographics, invasive imaging modality and the parameters used to create the computational models.

Age (yrs) Sex IVUS or OCT HR (bpm) BPmean (mmHg) Avg Qinlet (mL/s) ReCTA Reinasive No. of Elements (CTA) No. of Elements (invasive) Max edge size (cm) (CTA) Max edge size (cm) (invasive)
Patient 1 70 M OCT 63 99 0.8 143.5 154.2 98096 93230 0.030 0.030
Patient 2 55 F IVUS 60 85 0.2 35.0 30.1 65221 83265 0.040 0.040
Patient 3 57 M IVUS 70 99 0.4 65.7 65.9 206364 213869 0.03 0.030
Patient 4 66 M OCT 64 106 1.4 184.4 177.4 150611 103857 0.030 0.035
Patient 5 64 M IVUS 78 81 0.6 112.7 103.0 150145 172312 0.030 0.030
Patient 6 73 M OCT 63 67 1.3 257.5 226.2 93259 106668 0.060 0.064
Patient 7 48 M IVUS 67 74 1.1 147.0 121.8 130684 175214 0.040 0.040
Patient 8 57 M IVUS 70 125 4.3 470.5 388.5 78022 113754 0.045 0.045
Patient 9 52 M IVUS 68 82 0.5 63.3 50.7 125240 172283 0.045 0.045
Patient 10 51 M IVUS 68 97 0.5 92.3 75.5 126468 113195 0.030 0.035
Patient 11 46 M OCT 92 84 2.0 362.2 312.0 73870 61132 0.030 0.035
Patient 12 82 M IVUS 58 77 0.9 190.7 186.1 87515 91351 0.030 0.030
Patient 13 63 M IVUS 62 77 0.9 109.1 87.3 278431 402344 0.040 0.040
Patient 14 56 M IVUS 84 103 0.9 105.0 89.2 71832 56398 0.050 0.060

HR= heart rate; Q: flowrate; Re: Reynolds numbers