Table 3.
Demand scenarios used as constraints in the MILP model
| Location | Use | 2030 demand (MMTPA) | 2050 demand (MMTPA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Algeciras (Spain) | Shipping | 0.39 | 13 |
| Antwerp (Belgium) | Shipping | 0.39 | 13 |
| Fujairah (UAE) | Shipping | 1.17 | 39 |
| Germany | Domestic energy | 1.65 | 55 |
| Hong Kong | Shipping | 0.81 | 27 |
| Japan | Domestic energy | 3 | 100 |
| Los angeles (USA) | Shipping | 0.59 | 20 |
| Panama canal | Shipping | 0.59 | 20 |
| Rotterdam (Netherlands) | Shipping | 0.39 | 13 |
| Shanghai (China) | Shipping | 0.81 | 27 |
| Singapore | Shipping | 0.81 | 27 |
| South Korea | Domestic energy | 2.52 | 87 |
| Shipping | 0.81 | 27 |