Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;44(8):zsab034. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab034

Table 2.

Between-subjects correlations with all sleep stages

Sleep stage in % Correlation with % memory retention
Intervention condition Non-intervention condition Difference between correlation coefficients
N1 r(150) = –0.143, p = 0.078, BF01 = 3.32 r(148) = –0.059, p = 0.472, BF01 = 11.94 z = –0.73, p = 0.233
N2 r(152) = 0.183, p = 0.023, BF01 = 1.19 r(151) = –0.057, p = 0.485, BF01 = 12.23 z = 2.101, p = 0.018
SWS r(152) = 0.020, p = 0.809, BF01 = 15.20 r(150) = 0.110, p = 0.176, BF01 = 6.24 z = –0.783, p = 0.217
REM r(149) = 0.155, p = 0.058, BF01 = 2.59 r(149) = 0.230, p = 0.005*, BF01 = 0.28 z = –0.67, p = 0.251
WASO r(150) = –0.211, p = 0.009*, BF01 = 0.52 r(148) = –0.132, p = 0.107, BF01 = 4.24 z = –0.701, p = 0.242
TST (in minutes) r(148) = 0.142, p = 0.083, BF01 = 3.45 r(148) = 0.039, p = 0.635, BF01 = 13.81 z = 0.891, p = 0.186

Note. The table summarizes the results for the exploratory analysis on the correlation between the single sleep stages in % and memory retention across the nap separately for the two conditions. The difference between the correlation coefficients was analyzed by Fisher’s z-transformation. Bonferroni corrected p value is p = 0.01 (p = 0.05 divided by 5, see statistical analysis). BF < 0.3: moderate evidence for H1, BF < 1: anecdotal evidence for H1, BF < 3: anecdotal evidence for H0, BF < 10: moderate evidence for H0, BF < 30: strong evidence for H0.