. 2021 Jun 17;28(3):489–499. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2620

TABLE 1.

Bivariate correlations between SIP variables in provocation VR contexts and vignettes

	Range	M (SD)	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.
1. VR: Anger	2.50–10.00	7.09 (2.60)	.73^*	.48^*	.49^*	.37^*	.49^*	.53^*	.58^*
2. VR: Hostile intent attribution	1.25–10.00	6.76 (2.54)		.41^*	.52^*	.13	.56^*	.38^*	.47^*
3. VR: Revenge goals	0.00–1.00	0.38 (0.42)			.87^*	.21	.25	.67^*	.72^*
4. VR: Aggressive responding	0.00–2.00	0.88 (0.87)				.35^*	.37^*	.60^*	.73^*
5. Vignette: Anger	2.80–10.00	6.88 (1.86)					.34^*	.37^*	.48^*
6. Vignette: Hostile intent attribution	1.00–8.90	3.72 (1.99)						.35^*	.45^*
7. Vignette: Revenge goals	0.00–1.00	0.28 (0.33)							.93^*
8. Vignette: Aggressive responding	0.00–1.80	0.45 (0.53)

Note: All correlations including revenge goals are calculated using Kendall's τ, and other correlations used Pearson's r.

Indicates significance at .05, as the bootstrap 95% confidence interval did not include zero.