Table 5.
The result of the hierarchical regression analyses examining the scaffolding hypothesis using brain activation.
Dependent measure |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reading skill at T2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Predictor | β | R2 | ΔR2 | β | R2 | ΔR2 | β | R2 | ΔR2 | β | R2 | ΔR2 | |
Model 1 | Non-verbal IQ | .002 | .002 | .002 | .002 | ||||||||
Reading skill at T1 | .855 *** | .731 | .855 *** | .731 | .855 *** | .731 | .855 *** | .731 | |||||
Model 2 | Non-verbal IQ | .003 | .004 | .007 | −.020 | ||||||||
Reading skill at T1 | .856 *** | .855 *** | .854 *** | .858 *** | |||||||||
Onset>Perceptual in STG at T1 | .064 | .735 | .004 | ||||||||||
Rhyme> Perceptual in STG at T1 | .023 | .732 | .001 | ||||||||||
Onset>Perceptual in IFG at T1 | .021 | .732 | .001 | ||||||||||
Rhyme> Perceptual in IFG at T1 | −.072 | .736 | .005 |
= p < 0.05
= p < 0.01
= p < 0.001 uncorrected.