Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;58(1):56–66. doi: 10.1002/uog.22087

Table 4.

Comparison of detection rates of three models in screening for trisomy 21, at false‐positive rates (FPR) of 1%, 3% and 5%

Model Detection rate (% (95% CI)) for:
FPR of 1% FPR of 3% FPR of 5%
Fetal NT and maternal age
Training set 59 (52–66) 66 (59–73) 71 (65–77)
Validation set 76 (67–84) 82 (75–90) 84 (77–91)
All markers
Training set 92 (89–96) 96 (94–99) 98 (96–100)
Validation set 92 (87–97) 94 (90–99) 95 (91–99)
LASSO model
Training set 90 (86–95) 91 (87–95) 93 (90–96)
Validation set 92 (87–97) 93 (88–98) 94 (90–99)

For each model, sensitivity in validation set was calculated according to cut‐off of training set.

LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; NT, nuchal translucency thickness.