Table 4.
Comparison of detection rates of three models in screening for trisomy 21, at false‐positive rates (FPR) of 1%, 3% and 5%
Model | Detection rate (% (95% CI)) for: | ||
---|---|---|---|
FPR of 1% | FPR of 3% | FPR of 5% | |
Fetal NT and maternal age | |||
Training set | 59 (52–66) | 66 (59–73) | 71 (65–77) |
Validation set | 76 (67–84) | 82 (75–90) | 84 (77–91) |
All markers | |||
Training set | 92 (89–96) | 96 (94–99) | 98 (96–100) |
Validation set | 92 (87–97) | 94 (90–99) | 95 (91–99) |
LASSO model | |||
Training set | 90 (86–95) | 91 (87–95) | 93 (90–96) |
Validation set | 92 (87–97) | 93 (88–98) | 94 (90–99) |
For each model, sensitivity in validation set was calculated according to cut‐off of training set.
LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; NT, nuchal translucency thickness.