Table 1.
Author (Year) | Design of Study | Patients Number | Age (Yrs) | Follow-up (m) | Category | Coleman Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Remily et al (2021) [15] | RCS | 54 | 65(45.2-91.8) | 29.9(24.0-42.0) | RTKA | 52.5 |
Kong et al (2021) [16] | RCS | 42 |
3D group: 65.5±11.4 Static group:67.2±10.1 |
3D group:18(8-28) Static group:43(30-61) |
RTKA | 63 |
Zampelis et al (2020) [17] | PCS | 10 | 64(36-87) | 12 | RTHA | 51.5 |
Tetreault et al (2020) [18] | RCS | 139 | 66(44-88) | 28.8(24-43.2) | RTKA | 68 |
Durand et al (2020) [19] | PCS | 20 | 66(49-90) | 25.5(12-40) | RTHA | 65 |
Wan et al (2019) [20] | PCS | 42 |
3D group: 35.8±6.7 Control group: 34.9±5.9 |
12 | RTHA | 63.5 |
Li et al (2019) [21] | RCS | 16 | 58.06 ± 8.29 | 27.72±12.18 | RTHA | 60.5 |
Kieser et al (2018) [22] | RCS | 36 | 68(43-89) | 38(24-108) | RTHA | 66 |
Li et al (2016) [23] | RCS | 24 | 65(54-79) | 67(24-120) | RTHA | 58 |
Mao et al (2015) [24] | RCS | 22 | 60.9(38-80) | 81.6±24.9 | RTHA | 56.5 |
RCS retrospective clinical study, PCS prospective clinical study, RTKA revision total knee arthroplasty, RTHA revision total hip arthroplasty