Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 27;3:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.03.002

Table III.

Odds ratios (ORs) for a score in the range of “very large” impact of facial and truncal acne in HRQoL (per CDLQI and DLQI) in adjusted logistic regression models with age, sex, acne location, and severity as explanatory variables

Explanatory variables CDLQI score >12
DLQI score >10
Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value
Acne on both the face and trunk (F+T vs F) 1.86 (1.10 to 3.14) .028 1.61 (1.02 to 2.54) .042
Female vs male 1.07 (0.72 to 1.60) .672 0.93 (0.49 to 1.73) .766
Family history of acne: Yes 1.93 (0.94 to 3.97) .067 1.21 (0.78 to 1.89) .317
Urban vs rural residence 2.06 (0.96 to 4.42) .058 1.84 (1.02 to 3.33) .046
Unit increase in acne severity on face 2.31 (1.26 to 4.24) .017 2.25 (1.93 to 2.64) .001
Unit increase in acne severity on chest 1.99 (1.32 to 3.02) .008 2.20 (1.14 to 4.22) .027
Unit increase in acne severity on back 2.40 (1.15 to 5.00) .028 2.11 (1.62 to 2.75) .001

Country was also included in the adjusted analyses. Acne severities at each body site were not included together in the same model because of collinearity.

CDLQI, Children's dermatology life quality index; CI, confidence interval; DLQI, dermatology life quality index; F, facial acne only; F+T, combined facial and truncal acne; OR, odds ratio.