Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;8(4):ENEURO.0312-20.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0312-20.2021

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

A, Mirror reversal learning for all 12 subjects to targets in the second and fourth quadrants, normalized to 112.5°. The solution is 67.5°. The implicit process is shown separately with negative values being consistent with a rotational perturbation. B, Rotation-task-rotation-correction model for target at 112.5° with parameters tuned to limit the implicit process to ∼15°. C, Mirror-task-rotation-correction model with parameters defined as in B. D, Mirror-task-mirror-correction model with parameters defined as in previous. Implicit error term is reversed from the rotation correction.