Table 3.
Program director impressions of the curriculum in 2019
| Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching scripts were factually accurate, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 22.2 | 66.7 |
| Teaching scripts were well written, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 44.4 | 44.4 |
| Provided high-yield content, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 22.2 | 66.7 |
| Faculty impressions of curriculum were positive, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.6 | 44.4 |
| Fellow impressions of curriculum were positive, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 55.6 |
| Upper year fellows regularly attended, % | 0.0 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 44.4 |
| Curriculum met an unmet need in the program, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.6 | 44.4 |
| Easy to recruit faculty, % | 0.0 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 44.4 |
| Likely to continue conferences after study, % | 0.0 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 77.8 |
| Conferences positively impacted ambulatory patient care, % | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 33.3 | 44.4 |
N = 9 (of the eligible 12 programs who were in the intervention arm).