Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;32(5):e68. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e68

Table 1. Baseline and follow-up characteristics of 8,856 patients involved in our population-based study.

Characteristics Parameters Values
Age (yr) Median 37 (18–88)
25th–75th percentile 32–42
<20 14 (0.2)
20–29 1,373 (15.5)
30–39 4,203 (47.5)
40–49 2,485 (28.1)
50–59 487 (5.5)
60–69 210 (2.4)
>70 84 (0.9)
Gravidity Median 2 (0–13)
25th–75th percentile 0–3
Parity Median 1 (0–9)
25th–75th percentile 0–2
Menopausal status Premenopausal 8,182 (92.4)
Postmenopausal 674 (7.6)
Punch biopsy (diagnosis before conization) CIN 1 or CIN 2 536 (6.1)
CIN 3 8,108 (91.6)
Cervical cancer stage IA 158 (1.8)
Cervical cancer stage IB or higher 9 (0.1)
Adenocarcinoma in situ 16 (0.2)
Others 29 (0.3)
Type of treatment procedure Ultrasonic scalpel conization 2,463 (27.8)
Electrical scalpel conization 2,151 (24.3)
Laser scalpel conization 1,526 (17.2)
LEEP 1,324 (15.0)
S-T conization 1,024 (11.6)
Cold knife and other methods 368 (4.2)
Surgical margin status Positive 1,271 (14.4)
Negative 7,585 (85.6)
Complications after conization Yes 176 (2.0)
No 8,680 (98.0)
Additional treatment after conization Yes 294 (3.3)
No 8,562 (96.7)
Recurrence Yes 395 (4.5)
No 8,461 (95.5)
Follow-up period Median 28 (0–92)
25th–75th percentile 15–39

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; S-T, Shimodaira-Taniguchi.