Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;32(5):e68. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e68

Table 5. Significant predictive factors for positive surgical margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence.

Predictive factors Coefficient SE p-value OR 95% CI
Lower Upper
Age 0.035 0.014 0.014 1.036 1.007 1.066
Gravidity −0.329 0.130 0.012 0.719 0.557 0.929
Parity 0.455 0.162 0.005 1.576 1.148 2.164
Menopausal status
Premenopausal Reference
Postmenopausal 0.029 0.450 0.949 1.029 0.426 2.484
Type of treatment
Ultrasonic scalpel conization Reference
Laser scalpel conization −0.866 0.357 0.015 0.421 0.209 0.847
ST conization −0.929 0.380 0.014 0.395 0.188 0.831
Electrical scalpel conization −0.002 0.262 0.993 0.998 0.597 1.668
LEEP −0.067 0.272 0.805 0.935 0.548 1.595
CKC or other method 0.070 0.547 0.898 1.073 0.367 3.136
Complications after conization
No Reference
Yes 0.340 0.507 0.503 1.405 0.520 3.798

Multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine predictive factors associated with positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence despite lack of additional treatment. Initial predictive variables are described in Table 4.

CI, confidence interval; CKC, cold knife conization; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; S-T, Shimodaira-Taniguchi.