Table 5. Significant predictive factors for positive surgical margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence.
| Predictive factors | Coefficient | SE | p-value | OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Age | 0.035 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 1.036 | 1.007 | 1.066 | |
| Gravidity | −0.329 | 0.130 | 0.012 | 0.719 | 0.557 | 0.929 | |
| Parity | 0.455 | 0.162 | 0.005 | 1.576 | 1.148 | 2.164 | |
| Menopausal status | |||||||
| Premenopausal | Reference | ||||||
| Postmenopausal | 0.029 | 0.450 | 0.949 | 1.029 | 0.426 | 2.484 | |
| Type of treatment | |||||||
| Ultrasonic scalpel conization | Reference | ||||||
| Laser scalpel conization | −0.866 | 0.357 | 0.015 | 0.421 | 0.209 | 0.847 | |
| ST conization | −0.929 | 0.380 | 0.014 | 0.395 | 0.188 | 0.831 | |
| Electrical scalpel conization | −0.002 | 0.262 | 0.993 | 0.998 | 0.597 | 1.668 | |
| LEEP | −0.067 | 0.272 | 0.805 | 0.935 | 0.548 | 1.595 | |
| CKC or other method | 0.070 | 0.547 | 0.898 | 1.073 | 0.367 | 3.136 | |
| Complications after conization | |||||||
| No | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | 0.340 | 0.507 | 0.503 | 1.405 | 0.520 | 3.798 | |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine predictive factors associated with positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence despite lack of additional treatment. Initial predictive variables are described in Table 4.
CI, confidence interval; CKC, cold knife conization; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; S-T, Shimodaira-Taniguchi.