Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb 13;104(9):2240–2249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.024

Table 3.

Study 1: Percentages and means (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for dependent variables, by quantitative information conditions.

Quantitative information
Absent Present
N 450 451
% (CI) % (CI) P-value, OR
Gist recall/estimation
Item 1: False: “Vistasin eliminates the vision problems caused by wet AMD.” 38.4 (33.9, 43.0) 47.7 (43.0, 52.3) 0.004, 1.48
Item 2: Agree: “Vision will improve but won’t be back to normal.” 74.9 (70.9, 78.9) 86.5 (83.3, 89.6) <0.001, 2.20
Verbatim recall/estimation
Item 1: 45%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes another prescription drug by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” 1.3 (0.3, 2.4) 58.5 (54.0, 63.1) <0.001, 104.90
Item 2: 65%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes Vistasin by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” 3.6 (1.8, 5.3) 65.9 (61.5, 70.3) <0.001, 53.23
Item 3: Higher than 65%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes Vistasin by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” 17.8 (14.2, 21.3) 5.5 (3.4, 7.7) <0.001, 0.26
M (CI) M (CI) P-value, f
Perceived efficacy (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree) 4.06 (3.96, 4.16) 4.45 (4.35, 4.55) <0.001, 0.18

Note. OR = odds ratio. Verbatim items 2 and 3 represent two different codes of the same questionnaire item: correct (65%) and overestimated (higher than 65%).