Table 3.
Study 1: Percentages and means (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for dependent variables, by quantitative information conditions.
| Quantitative information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | Present | ||
| N | 450 | 451 | |
| % (CI) | % (CI) | P-value, OR | |
| Gist recall/estimation | |||
| Item 1: False: “Vistasin eliminates the vision problems caused by wet AMD.” | 38.4 (33.9, 43.0) | 47.7 (43.0, 52.3) | 0.004, 1.48 |
| Item 2: Agree: “Vision will improve but won’t be back to normal.” | 74.9 (70.9, 78.9) | 86.5 (83.3, 89.6) | <0.001, 2.20 |
| Verbatim recall/estimation | |||
| Item 1: 45%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes another prescription drug by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” | 1.3 (0.3, 2.4) | 58.5 (54.0, 63.1) | <0.001, 104.90 |
| Item 2: 65%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes Vistasin by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” | 3.6 (1.8, 5.3) | 65.9 (61.5, 70.3) | <0.001, 53.23 |
| Item 3: Higher than 65%: “On average, if someone with wet AMD takes Vistasin by what percentage will their blind spots shrink?” | 17.8 (14.2, 21.3) | 5.5 (3.4, 7.7) | <0.001, 0.26 |
| M (CI) | M (CI) | P-value, f | |
| Perceived efficacy (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree) | 4.06 (3.96, 4.16) | 4.45 (4.35, 4.55) | <0.001, 0.18 |
Note. OR = odds ratio. Verbatim items 2 and 3 represent two different codes of the same questionnaire item: correct (65%) and overestimated (higher than 65%).