Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2021 May 21;193(6):1238–1246. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17545

Table II:

Inheritance patterns of study participants

AD (non-TINF2) AD-TINF2 AR Unknown P value
Number 26 3 4 6
Genes 12 TERC, 9 TERT, 4 RTEL1, 1 MDM4 1 de novo, 2 inherited 2 RTEL1 2 CTC1
Age at DC/TBD diagnosis, y 42 (15–81) 4, 10, 33 15 (9–16) 15 (11–29) 0.0005
Age at study, y Median (range) 46 (16–81) 13, 27, 47 17 (14–18) 18 (13–31) 0.0005
BMF, N (%) 15 (58%) 3 (100%) 4 (100%) 5 (96%) 0.151
Age at BMF, y 27 (14–46) 3, 10, 33 14 (6–16) 8 (2–21) 0.0043
HCT, N (%) 4 (15%) 3 (100%) 3 (75%) 2 (33%) 0.002
Pregnancy, N (%) 22 (85%) 2 (67%) 0 2* (33%) 0.002
Age at 1st pregnancy, y 27 (17–38) 21, 31 16, 17 0.03
Age at LFU or death, y 46 (25–81) 16, 40, 47 18 (17–26) 18 (13–32) 0.0003
N died 7 2 0 2 0.277
Age at death, y 57 (25–63) 16, 47 29, 32 0.23

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = Autosomal recessive; UK = unknown; LFU = last follow-up; BMF = bone marrow failure; N = number; HCT = hematopoietic cell transplant

*

1 induced abortion at age 17 years; y = years. All ages are median (range)

All P values are global comparing AD non-TINF2 DC, TINF2, AR and unknown using Pearson chi2 for categorical and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables (Stata/SE 16.1 version). All P values were more significant when AD non-TINF2 DC was compared with all others as one group (TINF2, AR and unknown) which were similar to each other (data not shown).