Table 1.
Filtering volume time comparison between EMF and CP Select method.
| Sample ID | pH | Turbidity (NTU) | 40 mL filtering (min) |
60 mL filtering (min) |
100 mL filtering (min) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMF | CP Select | EMF | CP Select | EMF | CP Select | |||
| S1 | 7 | 26.7 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | Over 30 | 20 |
| S2 | 7 | 27.3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Over 30 | 5 |
| S3 | 7.5 | 13.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10 |
| S4 | 9 | 53 | 1 | 2 | Over 30 | 10 | Over 30 | 20 |
| S5 | 7.5 | 15.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 30 |
| S6 | 7 | 10.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| S7 | 7.5 | 11 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 14 |
| S8 | 7 | 1000 | Over 30 | 2 | Over 30 | 7 | Over 30 | 30 |
| S9 | 8.5 | 347 | Over 30 | 1 | Over 30 | 10 | Over 30 | 20 |
| S10 | 7.5 | 97.8 | 7 | 2 | Over 30 | 10 | Over 30 | 14 |
- Data is not available.