Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 14;42(11):9095–9108. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02106-7

Table 3.

Regression of T2 Adherence on Condition and Control Variables

Variable Intention-to-Treat Analysis Per-Protocol Analysis
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Intercept 4.48 (0.05)*** 1.77 (0.65) ** 4.48 (0.05)*** 2.27 (0.20)*** 1.29 (0.38)*** 0.95 (0.49)
Condition 0.06 (0.07) −1.08 (0.85)
Commitment 0.53 (0.07) *** 0.52 (0.04)*** 0.26 (0.06)*** 0.27 (0.06)***
Condition × Commitment 0.03 (0.10)
Self-control 0.01 (0.07)
Condition × Self-Control 0.16 (0.10)
Boredom 0.02 (0.07)
Condition × Boredom 0.12 (0.09)
If-then Planning 0.09 (0.09)
Condition × If-Then Planning 0.04 (0.11)
Condition (intenders) 0.18 (0.07)* 0.12 (0.06)* 0.10 (0.05)* 0.11 (0.05)*
Condition (non-intenders) −0.31 (0.15)* −0.09 (0.12) −0.05 (0.10) −0.05 (0.10)
T2 Difficulty −0.05 (0.04) −0.05 (0.04)
T1 Adherence 0.46 (0.08)*** 0.46 (0.09)***
T1 Difficulty 0.02 (0.04) −0.01 (0.05)
Demographics included
Num. obs. 451 451 451 451 451 451
R2 0.00 0.38 0.04 0.37 0.46 0.51
Adj. R2 −0.00 0.37 0.03 0.37 0.45 0.48
L.R. 0.65 216.63 17.08 211.00 278.21 326.25

Note. We report unstandardized coefficients with robust standard errors in parentheses. “Condition” refers to a dummy variable coded as 0 for the control condition and as 1 for the planning condition (or intenders and non-intenders). The demographic variables comprised age, gender, education, employment status, and income. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001