Table 2:
Pair-wise comparisons of fractional anisotropy
| ROI | PSP-RS vs Controls | PSP-SL vs Controls | PSP-P vs Controls | PSP-RS vs PSP-SL | PSP-RS vs PSP-P | PSP-SL vs PSP-P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| AUROC | P | AUROC | P | AUROC | P | AUROC | P | AUROC | P | AUROC | P | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| SCP | 0.73 | 0.046 | 0.51 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.03 | 0.61 | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| MCP | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0.98 |
| PTR | 0.90 | 0.002 | 0.93 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
| ALIC | 0.81 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0.004 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 0.63 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.003 |
| PLIC | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.052 | 0.66 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.80 | 0.001 |
| EC | 0.87 | 0.001 | 0.96 | 0.003 | 0.77 | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 0.79 | 0.01 |
| BCC | 0.91 | 0.001 | 1.00 | <0.001 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 0.92 | <0.001 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.91 | <0.001 |
| GCC | 0.84 | 0.04 | 0.95 | 0.004 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.02 |
| SCC | 0.81 | 0.18 | 0.85 | 0.06 | 0.72 | 0.28 | 0.61 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 0.62 | 0.31 |
| SLF | 0.77 | 0.047 | 0.90 | 0.006 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 0.80 | 0.004 |
| SFO | 0.91 | 0.001 | 0.98 | 0.001 | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.68 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.001 |
| IFO | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.71 |
p-values come from the Bayesian models; AUROC = area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ALIC = anterior limb of the internal capsule; BCC = body of the corpus callosum; EC = external capsule; GCC = genu of the corpus callosum; IFO = inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; MCP = middle cerebellar peduncle; PLIC = posterior limb of the internal capsule; PTR = posterior thalamic radiation; SCC = splenium of the corpus callosum; SCP = superior cerebellar peduncle; SFO = superior fronto-occipital fasciculus; SLF = superior longitudinal fasciculus