Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021 Mar 8;17(8):887–902. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1894122

Table 1.

Nonclinical and clinical models used to evaluate cardiotoxicity potential of drugs and chemicals.

Strengths Limitations
In silico predictions [26, 27]
  • No experimentation needed after the model has been developed

  • Rapid prediction of potential adverse effects

  • Most available models are focused on hERG blockade

  • Limited domain of applicability for environmental chemicals

Ion channel assays [30]
  • Provide direct mechanistic data on ion channel function

  • Large database(s) and broad familiarity with the methods

  • Challenges in identifying complex interactions

  • Generally labor-intensive

  • Inter-lab reproducibility is low

Microelectrode array (MEA) field potential measurements [148]
  • Assay of the electric current that is an integrator of the activity of multiple ion channels

  • Cells can be paced to different beat rates

  • Low throughput (generally up to 24- or 48-well formats)

  • Large number of cells are needed

Measurement of intracellular Ca2+ dynamics [51, 52]
  • High-throughput assay formats (up to 384-well plate format)

  • Highly sensitive read outs

  • High-content data outputs

  • Fluorescent dyes are cytotoxic to cells (i.e., terminal assay)

  • Specialized imaging equipment is needed

Tissue slices [34]
  • A biomimetic culture system that preserves cellular architecture

  • Available from humans and animals

  • Specialized expertise is needed

  • Limited availability of high-quality human heart tissue

Tissue chips [36]
  • Ability to recapitulate complex tissue on a chip in 3D

  • Enables assays of contractility

  • Rapidly evolving technology with few standardized platforms

  • Special expertise/equipment needed

Zebrafish [149, 150]
  • Model that allows studies of heart development

  • Human relevance is uncertain

Rodents [38]
  • Common pre-clinical species used for testing of both drugs and chemicals

  • Availability of genetic models

  • Major differences in physiology and electrophysiology with humans

  • Phenotyping is limited to pathology

Dog [40]
  • Common large pre-clinical species

  • Extensive regulatory database

  • Ethical considerations

  • High cost and low throughput

Swine [151, 152]
  • Commonly used for testing of cardiovascular devices (stents, valves, etc.)

  • Not as traditionally used as dogs

  • Low throughput

Non-human primates [43]
  • Most human-relevant species

  • Extensive regulatory database

  • Ethical considerations

  • High cost and low throughput

Thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study [45]
  • Direct human evidence for QT prolongation risk

  • High cost and narrow focus on QT as only one possible cardiotoxicity