Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2021 Jun 10;64(9):758–770. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23265

Table 2.

Models of standardized incidence ratios for bladder cancer by Poisson regression using cumulative o-toluidine exposure rank prediction with reference population ratesa (10year lag) in workers from a chemical manufacturing plant (n=1,875)

Parameter SIR Estimateb Std Error Approx. 95% CI (Wald)c Model deviance or chi square to remove variable

1 CaOut = exp(a0) × expt -2ln(L) = 1106.686
a0 0.9468 0.1474 0.65,1.24

2 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0) × expt -2ln(L) = 1106.346
a0 0.9309 0.1508 0.64,1.23
b1 0.451 0.723 −0.97,1.87

3 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0+c1×dur) × expt -2ln(L) = 1096.590
a0 0.3499 0.2672 −0.17,0.87
b1 0.595 0.7248 −0.83,2.02
c1 0.0319 0.0102 0.012,0.052 9.8

4 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0) × (1+c2×cumOTr) × expt -2ln(L) = 1079.482
a0 −0.323 0.4207 −1.15,0.50
b1 0.5849 0.7233 −0.83,2.00
c2 0.0573 0.0315 −0.004,0.12 26.8

5 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0+c1×dur) × (1+c2×cumOTr) × expt -2ln(L) = 1073.709
a0 −0.7895 0.6894 −2.14,0.56
b1 0.4967 0.7242 −0.92,1.92
c1 −0.0402 0.0152 −0.070,-0.011 5.8
c2 0.3184 0.2942 −0.26,0.90 22.6

6 CaOut = exp(2a0+b1×rac0) × (exp(c1×dur)+c2×cumOTr) × expt -2ln(L) = 1079.407
a0 −0.2868 0.4536 −1.18,0.60
b1 0.5794 0.7238 −0.84,2.00
c1 −0.0101 0.0545 −0.12,0.097 0.07
c2 0.0575 0.0306 −0.003,0.12 17.2

Note: CaOut – predicted incident cases of bladder cancer, expt – expected cases from reference population,

rac0 – indicator of non-white race (0,1), dur – employment duration, cumOTr – cumulative exposure rank, in unit-years.

a

Reference rates for six states (Pennsylvania, California, Ohio, Texas, Florida, and New York excluding New York City).

b

c2 is the estimate for the exposure response, or, excess relative rate per rank-year of exposure.

c

Wald CI not appropriate for linear relative rate term: c2.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SIR, standardized incidence ratio.