Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2021 Jun 10;64(9):758–770. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23265

Table 4.

Models of standardized incidence ratios for bladder cancer by Poisson regression using cumulative estimated o-toluidine exposure prediction with reference population ratesa (10-year lag) in workers from a chemical manufacturing plant (n=1,875)

Parameter SIR Estimateb Std Error Approx. 95% CI (Wald)c Model deviance or chi square to remove variable

1 CaOut = exp(a0) × expt -2ln(L) = 1108.680
a0 0.9476 0.1474 0.66, 1.24

2 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0) × expt -2ln(L) = 1105.226
a0 0.887 0.1543 0.58, 1.19
b1 1.1292 0.5233 0.10, 2.15

3 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0+c1×dur) × expt -2ln(L) = 1095.015
a0 0.2923 0.2698 −0.24, 0.82
b1 1.2373 0.5245 0.21, 2.27
c1 0.0326 0.0102 0.013, 0.053 10.2

4 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0) × (1+c2×cumOT) × expt -2ln(L) = 1076.304
a0 0.2048 0.2612 −0.31, 0.72
b1 1.2167 0.5236 0.19, 2.24
c2 0.5879 0.2506 0.097, 1.080 28.9

5 CaOut = exp(a0+b1×rac0+c1×dur) × (1+c2×cumOT) × expt -2ln(L) = 1075.97
a0 0.1384 0.2903 −0.43, 0.71
b1 1.2436 0.5258 0.21, 2.27
c1 0.00796 0.0133 −0.018, 0.034 0.33
c2 0.474 0.2592 −0.034, 0.980 19.1

6 CaOut = exp(2a0+b1×rac0) × (exp(c1×dur)+c2×cumOT) × expt -2ln(L) = 1074.088
a0 −0.0997 0.357 −0.80, 0.60
b1 1.2523 0.5242 0.23, 2.28
c1 0.0233 0.0161 −0.008, 0.05 2.22
c2 0.7135 0.3522 0.023, 1.40 20.9

Note: CaOut – predicted incident cases cases of bladder cancer, expt – expected cases from reference population,

rac0 – indicator of non-white race (0,1), dur – employment duration, cumOT – cumulative OT exposure, in ppm-years

a

Reference rates for six states (Pennsylvania, California, Ohio, Texas, Florida, and New York excluding New York City).

b

c2 is the estimate for the exposure response, or, excess relative rate per ppm-year of exposure

c

Wald CI not appropriate for linear relative rate term: c2

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SIR, standardized incidence ratio.