Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;11:16486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95026-2

Table 4.

Comparison of mean lumen diameter between computational stenting versus micro-computed tomography in bench cases by Bland–Altman analysis.

Mean lumen diameter
Cases Bias (mm) 95% limits of agreement (mm)
Bench #1
 MV 0.04 − 0.14 to 0.22
 SB 0.06 − 0.43 to 0.55
Bench #2
 MV 0.07 − 0.29 to 0.15
 SB 0.06 − 0.34 to 0.22
Bench #3
 MV 0.14 − 0.13 to 0.42
 SB 0.07 − 0.11 to 0.25
Bench #4
 MV 0.02 − 0.35 to 0.38
 SB 0.02 − 0.12 to 0.17
Overall bias 0.03 − 0.28 to 0.34