Table 4.
Comparison of mean lumen diameter between computational stenting versus micro-computed tomography in bench cases by Bland–Altman analysis.
| Mean lumen diameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cases | Bias (mm) | 95% limits of agreement (mm) |
| Bench #1 | ||
| MV | 0.04 | − 0.14 to 0.22 |
| SB | 0.06 | − 0.43 to 0.55 |
| Bench #2 | ||
| MV | 0.07 | − 0.29 to 0.15 |
| SB | 0.06 | − 0.34 to 0.22 |
| Bench #3 | ||
| MV | 0.14 | − 0.13 to 0.42 |
| SB | 0.07 | − 0.11 to 0.25 |
| Bench #4 | ||
| MV | 0.02 | − 0.35 to 0.38 |
| SB | 0.02 | − 0.12 to 0.17 |
| Overall bias | 0.03 | − 0.28 to 0.34 |